Evaluating Auvik alternatives? You’re likely looking for one of three things: a more affordable network monitoring solution, a platform that combines network monitoring with application performance monitoring (APM), or an on-premise deployment option.
Here’s what most IT teams discover: Auvik remains the best choice for network-first monitoring, especially for MSPs and multi-site environments. The predictable per-device pricing, automated discovery, and MSP-native architecture solve problems that alternatives like Datadog (expensive consumption-based billing) and SolarWinds (complex on-premise deployment) create.
However, legitimate alternatives exist for specific use cases, if you need full-stack observability including APM, Datadog excels. If you require on-premise deployment, SolarWinds or PRTG fit better. If budget is tight, open-source options like Nagios or Zabbix work.
This guide covers the 10 best actual network monitoring alternatives to Auvik, not generic ITSM tools or marketing automation platforms, but real competitors you should evaluate.
When Auvik is the RIGHT Choice (Why Most Teams Don’t Need Alternatives)
Before exploring alternatives, understand what makes Auvik the top choice for network-first IT teams and MSPs:
Auvik’s Core Strengths:
- MSP-native multi-tenancy – Manage 10, 50, or 500 client networks from one dashboard without complex configuration
- Predictable pricing – Per-device model starting ~$25/device vs Datadog’s consumption-based surprise bills ($5K-50K+/month)
- Automated discovery – Complete network map in 30 minutes vs weeks deploying SolarWinds agents
- Network-first approach – Purpose-built for infrastructure (switches, routers, firewalls) not application monitoring
- Unlimited users & sites – Entire team gets access without per-seat licensing
- Quick ROI – Typical payback in 3-6 months through reduced troubleshooting time
Real example: A 50-device network costs $800-1,200/month on Auvik vs $5,000-15,000+/month on Datadog for equivalent network monitoring.
Bottom line: If your primary need is network infrastructure visibility with predictable costs, Auvik delivers exactly that. Most teams evaluating alternatives discover they don’t actually need one, they need to understand what Auvik does (network monitoring) vs doesn’t do (application performance monitoring).
When You Actually Need an Auvik Alternative
Legitimate reasons to evaluate alternatives:
1. You Need Application Performance Monitoring (APM)
Problem: Auvik monitors network infrastructure but doesn’t provide application-level insights, distributed tracing, or code-level performance data.
Solution: Datadog, New Relic, Dynatrace – These excel at APM but cost 3-5x more than Auvik for network monitoring alone.
2. You Require On-Premise Deployment
Problem: Auvik is cloud-only. Some organizations require on-premise monitoring for compliance or air-gapped networks.
Solution: SolarWinds NPM, PRTG Network Monitor – On-premise options but require dedicated servers and manual maintenance.
3. You Have Very Small Budget
Problem: Auvik’s per-device pricing may exceed budget for small networks.
Solution: PRTG free tier (100 sensors), Nagios (open-source), Zabbix (free enterprise) – Lower cost but require more technical expertise.
4. You Need Full-Stack Observability
Problem: Auvik focuses on network infrastructure, not comprehensive monitoring across applications, containers, logs, and traces.
Solution: Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic – All-in-one observability platforms with higher costs.
Top 10 Auvik Alternatives for Network Monitoring
1. Datadog – Best for Full-Stack Observability + APM
Overview: Datadog is a cloud-native monitoring platform that combines infrastructure monitoring, application performance monitoring (APM), log management, and security in one platform.
Key Features:
- Application performance monitoring (APM) with distributed tracing
- Network Performance Monitoring (NPM) – requires agents on every host
- Log management and analytics
- Infrastructure monitoring across cloud, hybrid, and on-premise
- Container and Kubernetes-native monitoring
- Custom metrics and dashboards
- Real-time alerting and anomaly detection
Pros vs Auvik:
- Full-stack visibility – Monitors applications, infrastructure, logs, and traces in one platform
- APM capabilities – Code-level performance insights Auvik doesn’t provide
- Custom metrics – Flexible metric collection for complex environments
- Cloud-native – Deeply integrated with AWS, Azure, GCP
Cons vs Auvik:
- 3-5x more expensive – $15-23/host/month base + NPM add-on + data ingestion charges ($5K-50K+/month typical)
- Consumption-based surprise bills – Data ingestion, custom metrics create unpredictable costs
- Complex MSP setup – Multi-tenant architecture requires significant configuration
- Manual agent deployment – Weeks to deploy agents vs Auvik’s automated discovery
- Per-user licensing – Additional costs as team grows
Pricing:
Starting at $15/host/month (Pro) or $23/host/month (Enterprise), plus Network Performance Monitoring ($5/host/month), plus consumption-based charges for logs, custom metrics, and data retention.
Real example: 50-host infrastructure = $5,000-15,000+/month vs Auvik’s $800-1,200/month
Best For:
- DevOps teams needing full-stack observability
- Organizations requiring APM + infrastructure monitoring
- Cloud-native microservices architectures
- Teams with budget for comprehensive monitoring
Not for: Network-first MSPs, budget-conscious teams, organizations needing predictable pricing
2. SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor (NPM) – Best for On-Premise Deployment
Overview: SolarWinds NPM is an on-premise network monitoring solution designed for enterprise IT teams managing complex network infrastructures.
Key Features:
- On-premise deployment with full data control
- Network performance monitoring across multi-vendor environments
- Automated network discovery and mapping
- NetFlow, sFlow, J-Flow, and IPFIX traffic analysis
- Configuration management and compliance
- Wireless network monitoring
- Path analysis and hop-by-hop diagnostics
Pros vs Auvik:
- On-premise deployment – Full data control for compliance-sensitive industries
- Air-gapped support – Works in isolated networks
- Deep enterprise features – Advanced path analysis, hop-by-hop diagnostics
- Perpetual licensing option – Buy once, own forever (plus maintenance)
Cons vs Auvik:
- Weeks to deploy – Requires dedicated server hardware, installation, configuration vs Auvik’s 30-minute setup
- Infrastructure costs – Dedicated servers, backup systems, IT time for maintenance
- Manual updates – Patches and upgrades require IT effort vs Auvik’s automatic cloud updates
- Not MSP-friendly – Single-tenant architecture, complex multi-client management
- Limited scalability – Constrained by server capacity, requires hardware upgrades
Pricing:
Starting at $2,995 for 100 elements (one-time), plus 18-20% annual maintenance ($600-800/year). Doesn’t include server hardware costs ($2K-10K+), IT time for deployment/maintenance, or backup systems.
Best For:
- Enterprises requiring on-premise deployment
- Organizations in compliance-sensitive industries (finance, healthcare, government)
- Air-gapped or isolated networks
- Teams with IT resources for maintenance
Not for: MSPs, cloud-first teams, organizations wanting fast deployment, small IT teams
3. PRTG Network Monitor – Best for Budget-Conscious Teams
Overview: PRTG is a comprehensive network monitoring tool using per-sensor licensing, offering a free tier for small networks and scalable pricing for larger deployments.
Key Features:
- Per-sensor licensing (one sensor per monitored metric)
- Free tier up to 100 sensors
- On-premise and cloud deployment options
- Network, server, application, and bandwidth monitoring
- Over 250 pre-configured sensor types
- Customizable dashboards and maps
- Mobile apps for iOS and Android
Pros vs Auvik:
- Free tier available – Monitor up to 100 sensors at no cost (Auvik has no free tier)
- Lower entry cost – $1,750 for 500 sensors vs Auvik’s per-device model
- On-premise option – Full data control if needed
- Flexible sensor types – Over 250 pre-configured sensors
Cons vs Auvik:
- Sensor count grows quickly – One switch = 10-20 sensors, costs escalate fast
- Dated interface – UI looks like it’s from 2010s vs Auvik’s modern design
- Per-user licensing – Higher tiers charge per user (Auvik = unlimited users)
- Manual configuration – Network mapping requires manual setup vs Auvik’s automation
- Limited mobile access – Mobile app has reduced functionality
Pricing:
Free up to 100 sensors, then $1,750 (500 sensors), $3,950 (1,000 sensors), $7,950 (2,500 sensors), $15,500 (5,000 sensors), $27,999 (unlimited sensors).
Watch out: Sensor count grows fast – one network device can use 10-20 sensors, making larger deployments expensive.
Best For:
- Small networks (under 100 sensors) wanting free monitoring
- Budget-conscious teams with technical expertise
- Organizations needing on-premise deployment
- IT teams comfortable with manual configuration
Not for: MSPs (no multi-tenancy), teams wanting modern UI, organizations needing automated discovery
4. LogicMonitor – Best for Hybrid Cloud Monitoring
Overview: LogicMonitor is a SaaS-based infrastructure monitoring platform optimized for hybrid cloud and multi-cloud environments.
Key Features:
- Cloud-based monitoring for hybrid and multi-cloud infrastructures
- Auto-discovery of resources across AWS, Azure, GCP, on-premise
- AIOps-powered alerting and anomaly detection
- Customizable dashboards and topology mapping
- Log aggregation and analysis
- Container and Kubernetes monitoring
- API-first architecture for integrations
Pros vs Auvik:
- Hybrid cloud expertise – Seamless monitoring across cloud and on-premise
- AIOps capabilities – Machine learning-powered alerting reduces noise
- Auto-discovery – Automatic resource detection similar to Auvik
- Broader coverage – Monitors beyond network (applications, databases, cloud services)
Cons vs Auvik:
- Higher cost – Enterprise-focused pricing (custom quotes required)
- Complex pricing model – Per-resource, per-instance charges add up
- Not network-first – General infrastructure monitoring vs Auvik’s network specialization
- Steeper learning curve – More complex than Auvik’s network-focused interface
Pricing:
Custom quotes required – Typically $200-500+/month for small deployments, scaling with infrastructure size. Enterprise contracts often $2K-10K+/month.
Best For:
- Enterprises with hybrid cloud infrastructures
- Organizations migrating to cloud
- Teams needing infrastructure monitoring beyond networking
- Companies with budget for enterprise solutions
Not for: MSPs needing network-first tools, small IT teams, budget-conscious organizations
5. ManageEngine OpManager – Best for Large Enterprises
Overview: OpManager is a comprehensive network management solution from ManageEngine, designed for large enterprise environments with complex multi-vendor networks.
Key Features:
- Network performance monitoring across multi-vendor environments
- Automated network discovery and mapping
- Fault and performance management
- NetFlow, sFlow, jFlow traffic analysis
- Configuration management and compliance
- Wireless LAN monitoring
- VoIP monitoring
- Integration with ServiceDesk Plus for ITSM workflows
Pros vs Auvik:
- Enterprise-grade features – Deep monitoring for complex environments
- On-premise and cloud options – Deployment flexibility
- Lower cost than competitors – More affordable than SolarWinds or LogicMonitor for enterprises
- ITSM integration – Native integration with ServiceDesk Plus
Cons vs Auvik:
- Complex setup – Weeks to fully configure vs Auvik’s 30 minutes
- Dated interface – Not as modern as Auvik’s UI
- Not MSP-friendly – Multi-tenant setup requires significant work
- Steeper learning curve – Enterprise features add complexity
Pricing:
Starting at $715 for 25 devices, scaling to $18,895 for 1,000 devices. On-premise perpetual licensing available. Annual maintenance typically 20% of license cost.
Best For:
- Large enterprises (500+ devices)
- Organizations needing ServiceDesk Plus integration
- Teams requiring on-premise deployment
- IT departments with dedicated network operations centers
Not for: MSPs, small IT teams, organizations wanting quick deployment
6. Nagios Core – Best Open-Source Option
Overview: Nagios Core is the industry-standard open-source infrastructure monitoring solution, free to use but requiring significant technical expertise to deploy and maintain.
Key Features:
- 100% free and open-source
- Network, server, and application monitoring
- Extensible plugin architecture (thousands of community plugins)
- Alerting and notification system
- Custom scripting capabilities
- Large community support
- No vendor lock-in
Pros vs Auvik:
- Completely free – Zero licensing costs (Auvik starts at $25/device/month)
- Highly customizable – Script anything you can imagine
- No vendor lock-in – Own your monitoring infrastructure
- Massive plugin ecosystem – Monitor virtually anything
Cons vs Auvik:
- Requires deep technical expertise – Steep learning curve, command-line configuration
- Weeks to deploy and configure – Manual setup for every device vs Auvik’s automated discovery
- No modern UI – Dated interface from 1990s/2000s era
- High maintenance burden – IT time for updates, troubleshooting, configuration
- No automated discovery – Manual device addition and configuration
- No support – Community-based only (unless you buy Nagios XI commercial version)
Pricing:
Free (open-source). Commercial version (Nagios XI) starts at $1,995/year for 100 nodes.
Hidden costs: IT time for deployment (40-80 hours), maintenance (10-20 hours/month), troubleshooting, and configuration.
Best For:
- Organizations with near-zero budget
- IT teams with deep Linux/scripting expertise
- Companies requiring complete customization
- Teams valuing no vendor lock-in over ease of use
Not for: MSPs (no multi-tenancy), small IT teams, organizations wanting quick deployment, teams lacking Linux expertise
7. Zabbix – Best Free Enterprise Monitoring
Overview: Zabbix is an enterprise-grade open-source monitoring solution that’s more user-friendly than Nagios while remaining completely free.
Key Features:
- Free and open-source
- Web-based configuration interface (easier than Nagios)
- Auto-discovery of network devices
- Real-time monitoring and alerting
- Customizable dashboards and graphs
- Support for large-scale deployments (10,000+ devices)
- Distributed monitoring architecture
- Native API for integrations
Pros vs Auvik:
- Completely free – Zero licensing costs for unlimited devices
- Modern web interface – Better UI than Nagios (though not as polished as Auvik)
- Auto-discovery – Discovers devices automatically (similar to Auvik)
- Scalable – Handles 10,000+ devices
- Active development – Regular updates from open-source community
Cons vs Auvik:
- Requires technical expertise – Not as simple as Auvik’s plug-and-play setup
- Days to deploy – Initial setup takes 5-10 days vs Auvik’s 30 minutes
- Manual configuration needed – Auto-discovery requires tuning
- No official support – Community-based only (commercial support available separately)
- Not MSP-friendly – Multi-tenancy requires custom development
Pricing:
Free (open-source). Commercial support available from Zabbix LLC or partners (typically $5K-20K+/year for enterprise support contracts).
Best For:
- Enterprises with limited budget but technical resources
- Organizations wanting free monitoring at scale (1,000+ devices)
- IT teams with Linux/MySQL expertise
- Companies requiring open-source for compliance
Not for: MSPs, small IT teams, organizations wanting turnkey solutions, teams lacking technical expertise
8. WhatsUp Gold – Best SolarWinds Alternative
Overview: WhatsUp Gold from Progress is a comprehensive network monitoring solution similar to SolarWinds but often at lower cost with easier deployment.
Key Features:
- Network performance monitoring
- Automated network discovery and mapping
- NetFlow, sFlow, J-Flow traffic analysis
- Wireless network monitoring
- Configuration management
- Application performance monitoring (add-on)
- Virtualization monitoring (VMware, Hyper-V)
- On-premise and cloud options
Pros vs Auvik:
- On-premise deployment – Full data control
- Lower cost than SolarWinds – More affordable for similar features
- Easier setup than SolarWinds – Faster deployment (still slower than Auvik)
- Perpetual licensing – Buy once, own forever option
Cons vs Auvik:
- Days to deploy – Requires server setup and configuration vs Auvik’s 30 minutes
- Infrastructure costs – Dedicated server, backup systems, maintenance
- Not MSP-friendly – Single-tenant architecture
- Manual updates – Patches require IT time vs Auvik’s automatic cloud updates
- Limited mobile access – Mobile app has reduced functionality
Pricing:
Starting at $1,790 for 25 devices, scaling to $14,235 for 500 devices. Perpetual licensing available. Annual maintenance typically 20% of license cost.
Best For:
- Organizations wanting SolarWinds features at lower cost
- IT teams requiring on-premise deployment
- Companies in compliance-sensitive industries
- Enterprises with dedicated network operations teams
Not for: MSPs, cloud-first teams, organizations wanting quick deployment
9. Domotz – Best for Small MSPs
Overview: Domotz is a lightweight network monitoring solution designed specifically for small MSPs and IT service providers managing client networks.
Key Features:
- Cloud-based monitoring for MSPs
- Automated network discovery
- Remote access and troubleshooting
- Network topology mapping
- SNMP monitoring
- Speed test capabilities
- Power management (remote reboot)
- Integration with PSA/RMM tools
Pros vs Auvik:
- Lower cost – $21/month per network vs Auvik’s $25/device (better for small sites)
- Simple setup – Quick deployment similar to Auvik
- MSP-focused – Multi-tenant architecture
- Power management – Remote reboot capabilities
Cons vs Auvik:
- Limited enterprise features – Less robust than Auvik for large networks
- No NetFlow analysis – Missing traffic intelligence
- Basic alerting – Not as sophisticated as Auvik’s alerting
- Per-network pricing – Can be expensive for large multi-site deployments
- Limited configuration management – Basic compared to Auvik
Pricing:
$21/month per network (Team plan), $29/month per network (Business plan), $109/month per network (Enterprise plan).
Best for small sites: If managing 50 clients with 1-5 devices each, Domotz ($21/network) beats Auvik ($25/device). For larger sites, Auvik often wins.
Best For:
- Small MSPs managing many small client networks (1-10 devices per site)
- IT service providers needing remote access + monitoring
- Teams with limited budget
- Organizations requiring power management features
Not for: Large enterprises, networks requiring NetFlow analysis, teams needing advanced features
10. LiveAction – Best for Network Performance Management
Overview: LiveAction is a network performance management platform that combines deep packet inspection, flow analysis, and network visualization for enterprise networks.
Key Features:
- Deep packet inspection (DPI)
- Advanced flow analysis (NetFlow, sFlow, IPFIX)
- Network visualization and topology mapping
- Application performance monitoring
- VoIP call quality monitoring
- Security threat detection
- Real-time and historical analytics
- Forensic packet capture
Pros vs Auvik:
- Deep packet inspection – More detailed traffic analysis than Auvik’s NetFlow
- Advanced security features – Threat detection capabilities
- Forensic capabilities – Detailed packet capture for troubleshooting
- VoIP monitoring – Call quality analysis
Cons vs Auvik:
- Enterprise-only pricing – Expensive, requires custom quotes
- Complex deployment – Weeks to implement vs Auvik’s 30 minutes
- Steep learning curve – Advanced features require training
- Not MSP-friendly – Enterprise-focused, not multi-tenant
- Overkill for most teams – More than needed unless you require DPI
Pricing:
Custom quotes required – Typically $10K-50K+/year for enterprise deployments.
Best For:
- Large enterprises requiring deep packet inspection
- Organizations with security/compliance requirements for packet capture
- Networks with VoIP quality issues
- IT teams needing forensic troubleshooting capabilities
Not for: MSPs, small IT teams, budget-conscious organizations, teams wanting simple monitoring
Which Auvik Alternative is Right for You?
Choose Auvik if:
- You’re an MSP managing multiple client networks
- Your primary need is network infrastructure visibility (switches, routers, firewalls)
- You want predictable monthly costs without consumption-based surprises
- You need quick deployment (30 minutes vs weeks)
- You value unlimited users and sites
- You want automated discovery and configuration backups
Typical cost: $800-1,200/month for 50-device network
Choose Datadog if:
- You need full-stack observability including APM
- Your focus is application performance rather than network infrastructure
- You have budget for consumption-based pricing ($5K-50K+/month)
- You’re monitoring cloud-native microservices architectures
- You need deep integrations with AWS, Azure, GCP
Typical cost: $5,000-15,000+/month for 50-host infrastructure
Choose SolarWinds NPM if:
- You require on-premise deployment for compliance
- You’re in finance, healthcare, or government with data residency requirements
- You have air-gapped or isolated networks
- You have IT resources for deployment and maintenance
- You prefer perpetual licensing over subscription
Typical cost: $2,995 one-time + $600/year maintenance for 100 devices
Choose PRTG if:
- You have very limited budget
- Your network is small (under 100 sensors for free tier)
- You have technical expertise for manual configuration
- You need on-premise deployment
- You’re comfortable with dated interface
Typical cost: Free (100 sensors), $1,750 (500 sensors)
Choose Open-Source (Nagios/Zabbix) if:
- You have near-zero budget
- Your IT team has deep Linux/scripting expertise
- You require complete customization
- You value no vendor lock-in over ease of use
- You have time for weeks of deployment and ongoing maintenance
Typical cost: Free (software), but 40-80 hours deployment + 10-20 hours/month maintenance
Why Most Teams Stick with Auvik
After evaluating alternatives, many teams discover Auvik remains the best choice for network-first monitoring:
Common Reasons Teams Stay with Auvik:
1. Datadog is Too Expensive for Network-Only Needs
“We evaluated Datadog but realized we were paying $12K/month for features we didn’t need. Auvik gives us network monitoring for $1,200/month—exactly what we require.”
— Network Engineer, 500-device enterprise
2. SolarWinds Deployment Too Time-Consuming
“We started deploying SolarWinds but after 3 weeks of setup, we tried Auvik. Had complete network visibility in 30 minutes. Never looked back.”
— IT Manager, multi-site financial services firm
3. PRTG Sensor Count Spiraled Out of Control
“PRTG looked cheap initially, but monitoring 30 switches ate through 600 sensors. The cost exceeded Auvik while providing less functionality.”
— MSP Owner managing 40 clients
4. MSP Multi-Tenancy is Native, Not an Afterthought
“We tried configuring Datadog for multi-client management. It was a nightmare. Auvik handles our 50 clients natively—saved us months of configuration work.”
— MSP Technical Director
5. ROI is Clear Within Months
“Auvik eliminated 10+ hours per week of manual network documentation. At $60/hour, that’s $31K/year in saved labor. Auvik pays for itself in 4 months.”
— Director of IT, 300-device manufacturing company
Frequently Asked Questions About Auvik Alternatives
What is the cheapest alternative to Auvik?
PRTG Network Monitor offers a free tier for up to 100 sensors, making it the cheapest commercial alternative. Open-source options like Nagios and Zabbix are completely free but require significant IT time for deployment (40-80 hours) and maintenance (10-20 hours/month). For most organizations, the “free” cost is offset by IT labor expenses. Domotz ($21/month per network) can be cheaper for MSPs managing many small sites (1-5 devices each).
Is Datadog better than Auvik?
Datadog is better if you need full-stack observability including application performance monitoring (APM), distributed tracing, and custom metrics. Auvik is better if your primary need is network infrastructure monitoring with predictable costs. For network monitoring specifically, Auvik costs 60-85% less than Datadog ($800-1,200/month vs $5,000-15,000+/month for 50-device network). Many organizations use both: Auvik for network infrastructure + Datadog for application performance.
Can I use Auvik and another tool together?
Yes. Many organizations use Auvik for network monitoring alongside complementary tools: Auvik + Datadog (network + APM), Auvik + Splunk (network + log management), Auvik + ServiceNow (network + ITSM). Auvik integrates with 20+ platforms including ConnectWise, Autotask, Freshdesk, PagerDuty, and Slack.
What do MSPs use instead of Auvik?
MSPs primarily use Auvik due to its native multi-tenancy. Alternatives include: Domotz (for small MSPs managing many small sites), LogicMonitor (larger MSPs with budget for enterprise tools), and PRTG (MSPs with technical expertise for manual configuration). Most MSP-focused alternatives lack Auvik’s combination of multi-tenancy, automated discovery, and per-device pricing.
Why would I choose SolarWinds over Auvik?
Choose SolarWinds if you:
- Require on-premise deployment for compliance or air-gapped networks,
- Need perpetual licensing rather than subscription,
- Have dedicated network operations center with staff for deployment/maintenance,
- Must keep all monitoring data on-premise for regulatory reasons.
SolarWinds costs more in total (server hardware + licensing + IT time) but offers on-premise control Auvik’s cloud model can’t provide.
Can Auvik monitor applications like Datadog?
No. Auvik monitors network infrastructure (switches, routers, firewalls, servers, workstations) but does not provide application performance monitoring (APM), distributed tracing, or code-level insights. If you need APM, consider Datadog, New Relic, or Dynatrace. If you need both network monitoring and APM, use Auvik + Datadog together, or choose Datadog alone if budget allows for its higher cost.
Is there a completely free alternative to Auvik?
Yes. Nagios Core and Zabbix are completely free open-source monitoring solutions. However, they require:
- 40-80 hours for initial deployment,
- 10-20 hours/month for maintenance,
- Deep Linux and scripting expertise,
- Manual device configuration vs Auvik’s automated discovery.
For most organizations, the “free” software costs more in IT labor than Auvik’s subscription. PRTG’s free tier (100 sensors) is free but limited to small networks.
Ready to Compare Auvik vs Alternatives?
The Best Way to Evaluate: Try Auvik First
Most teams evaluating alternatives start by deploying Auvik’s 14-day free trial to establish a baseline:
Week 1: Deploy Auvik (30 minutes), see automated discovery in action, review device categorization, test NetFlow analysis (Core tier)
Week 2: Compare against alternatives – deploy SolarWinds, PRTG, or request Datadog demo. Evaluate deployment time, ease of use, feature sets, and costs side-by-side.
Result: Most teams discover Auvik delivers 80% of what they need at 20-40% the cost of alternatives.
